![]() No Labels has not explained why Biden is not the sort of moderate leader it claims it is seeking. Like Perot’s campaign, No Labels’ policy menu is full of platitudes with which few people might disagree, but leaves unsaid how to fulfill them. In 1992, independent Ross Perot set the modern high-water mark with 18.9% of the popular vote, but won no states and is generally credited with helping Bill Clinton defeat George H.W. Nader won no states in 2000 and finished with only 2.7% of the popular vote. Republican incumbent William Howard Taft, T.R.’s former protégé, was left with two.Ĭhicago Tribune1992: Clinton elected president: A variation of the election results graphics from 1900-08 returned to the top of the page, complete with the electoral vote map. The most promising third-party option since, former President Theodore Roosevelt’s “Bull Moose” ticket in 1912, carried only six states but helped Democrat Woodrow Wilson win 40 others. They were not an entirely new party, though, as they embodied the anti-slavery wing of the newly defunct Whigs at a time when the Democratic Party had split in two. No third-party candidacy has come close to winning since Republicans managed it on their second try in 1860. But that lifted only part of the veil on No Labels’ dark money. Those who can’t take the heat don’t belong in politics.įrom the filings of a nonprofit that contributes to No Labels, Mother Jones magazine found 36 wealthy contributors and corporate executives who have generally favored conservative Republican candidates, although some have backed Democrats. People have a right to know who’s trying to influence them - and why. Unlike a genuine political party, No Labels refuses to identify its financial supporters, saying that’s to save them from personal attacks. The Lincoln Project, comprised of Never-Trump Republicans, calls No Labels a “GOP Super PAC.” Known for its hard-hitting ads, Lincoln is teaming with former House Majority Leader Richard Gephardt and other prominent Democrats to head off No Labels. Each set of charges seems to solidify his support among Republican primary voters. That is unlikely at the moment, despite Trump’s tangled legal problems with two more indictments anticipated. No Labels has hinted it would scrap its independent ticket plan if Republicans don’t nominate Trump. Would those same voters truly opt for a third party if they thought it would elect Trump? It’s an open question. Many voters like the concept of a third way alternative until actual names are tested. “It is a vivid indication that for many voters the status quo is a no-go,” explained Quinnipiac analyst Tim Malloy. Nearly two-thirds of independents agreed. In a recent Quinnipiac University poll, 47% of voters said they would consider a third-party candidate in 2024. It is true that many Americans dread a Biden-Trump rematch. But it would more likely seduce independents, conservative Democrats and the moderate minority of Republicans whose votes Biden badly needs. The No Labels pitch would be lost on Trump’s hopelessly devoted hard-core MAGA base. A No Labels candidate wouldn’t need to carry any of those states, or any state, to hand the White House back to Trump in 2024.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |